Les Chantiers de la Liberté

Idées et analyses sur les dynamiques politiques et diplomatiques.

MACRON RECOGNIZES PALESTINE, BUT DOES THE WORLD STILL RECOGNIZE FRANCE?

MACRON RECOGNIZES PALESTINE, BUT DOES THE WORLD STILL RECOGNIZE FRANCE?

The question is threefold: will the unilateral decision by the President of the French Republic—declaring a sovereign Palestinian state last Wednesday—have any chance of contributing to a future peace agreement between Israel and its Palestinian neighbour? If not, will it at least reinforce France’s role and reputation on the international stage?

If the answer to those two preliminary questions is negative, why did Emmanuel Macron make such a decision, risking another diplomatic dead-end for France?

The response to the first question is obviously negative. Unilateral and unconditional recognition pleases Arabs, the Muslim world in general, Hamas (which congratulates us!), and doubtless the large Muslim community in France courted by Mélenchon and Villepin. But it convinces neither Trump’s America—which judges it “of no importance”—nor Germany and other democratic nations.

Macron himself had perfectly integrated a simple reason into his initial plan: recognition should follow—not precede—the achievement of three cardinal conditions: first, the eradication of Hamas’s bloody regime in Gaza and its complete demilitarization, together with the release of the remaining hostages; second, a comprehensive overhaul of the Palestinian Authority to render it capable of governing the future Palestine; third, mutual recognition by both Arabs (starting with Saudi Arabia) and Israelis.

That was Macron’s coherent initial project, before it was abruptly sidelined by the eruption of the Twelve‑Day War between Israel and Iran.

By no longer demanding anything from Hamas—whose charter clearly affirms that it is resolutely Islamist, not nationalist, and fights not for a Palestinian state but for the total destruction of Israel—Macron’s recognition becomes entirely inaudible in Israel, forever marked by 7 October.

Moreover, by no longer asking Arab states for reciprocal recognition of Israel, Macron’s initiative isolates Israel further, while undermining the permanence of the Abraham Accords. Those accords had begun a rapprochement process between Israel and Arab states without Palestinian preconditions—precisely why Hamas, armed by Iran, attacked on 7 October. Thus, Macron’s initiative ends up vindicating Hamas’s leaders a posteriori!

Israel is now accused from all sides of the worst crimes—genocide, of ceding to the Palestinian state. Only then—and perhaps only then—will Arab states intervene to recognize the Jewish state.

Such a stance may be seen as a symbolic gesture at a time when the world’s attention is fixed on famine in Gaza—provided one forgets that the Gaza population’s extreme suffering, its condition as “martyrs,” is deliberately cultivated by Hamas as a key element of its “victory” over Israel. Also forgotten is that for years Israeli towns were bombarded by missiles from Gaza and Lebanon—and later by hundreds of missiles from Iran against Israeli urban centres.

It is symbolic indeed—but in no way the first step in a thoughtful, serious French diplomatic effort toward the famed “two‑state solution.”

If this initiative has no chance of achieving peace in the Middle East, will it at least strengthen France’s role and voice on the world stage?

The answer, again, is hardly encouraging. Our European partners, our American ally, and many capitals of the Global South have fully grasped our country’s economic, financial, and even military weakness.

Expelled ignominiously from Africa, betrayed by our best allies in the Asia‑Pacific (AUKUS), openly scorned by Trump (“He’s a nice guy—but what he says doesn’t matter”), our country is being openly challenged by Algeria, which has been sending its criminals to us while holding our citizens hostage.

At best, Macron’s latest move will appear as yet another 180‑degree turn. Early in Ukraine’s war, Macron called for respecting Russia’s security interests, only later to denounce Russia as “an existential threat to France and Europe.”

The same pattern is at work in the Middle East: immediately after 7 October, Macron offered Netanyahu an international coalition against Hamas—even though the Israeli leader neither asked for nor needed it—before later demanding repeated ceasefires from Israel in its fight against Hezbollah and Hamas.

Had Macron been listened to, Hezbollah would still rule Lebanon, Assad would still rule Syria, and Tehran would remain the superpower of the region…

So why all the fuss around a move that everyone understands was doomed from the start?

To stop being accused of “double standards” by the Global South, as they sometimes say at the Quai d’Orsay? For moral reasons, certainly understandable in the face of famine in Gaza?

But then why remain silent on Sudan, Nagorno‑Karabakh, Kurdistan, or North Kivu, where massacres of civilians abound?

“No Jews, no news,” then? Or simply because this president—completely weakened and marginalized even in France—feels an irrepressible need to continue existing, to remain always in the spotlight?

His way of staying relevant, when he can no longer govern the country for lack of a parliamentary majority, is stacking trips across the world, summits, and media initiatives on nearly every subject.

Macron must be the saviour. Saviour of Greenland, the environment, Ukraine, and, incidentally, “Sovereign Europe” that he claims to lead—despite the extra trillion in debt he’s leaving France after eight years in power.

Now he is the saviour of the Palestinians. The French have learned what being “saved” by Emmanuel Macron cost them. Others will learn as well.

Partager cet article

Repost0
Pour être informé des derniers articles, inscrivez vous :
Commenter cet article
M
A remarkable analysis and I allow myself to submit some thoughts:<br /> <br /> Emmanuel Macron travels and travels and travels still.<br /> He keeps talking and talking and talking still.<br /> He’ll say one thing, and next thing you know, he’ll say the exact opposite. Such contradiction is perceived as a lack of credibility.<br /> He seems to want to be in the limelight, whatever it takes.<br /> Being in the spotlight seems to irresistibly attract him.<br /> Icarus wanted to fly too close to the sun and he burned his wings.<br /> One day, Emmanuel Macron could as well fall victim to his perpetual boasting about and to his naiveté. Let’s hope that he won’t drag a France – rarely consulted and already at the edge of the abyss –down with him in his fall.<br /> <br /> On June 18th, he meant to recognize a Palestinian state, but the Twelve-Day War destroyed his plan.<br /> Well, he’s done it again. Now, he proposes to recognize a Palestinian state on upcoming September 20th.<br /> Israelis are perplexed and worried, so are a great many French, and rightly so.<br /> As it is, the conditions for Palestinian statehood are absolutely not met. To say that Emmanuel Macron wants to put the cart before the horse is quite an understatement in this context.<br /> <br /> Formerly, according to International Law, a prospective state had to fulfill three criteria :<br /> It was necessary to have a well-defined territory. What are we talking about today?<br /> It was necessary to have a well-defined population.<br /> Are we then talking about a Gazan population under the influence, prone to radical Islam, where 75 % of those surveyed appreciate the terrorist attack of October 7, 2023 ? In the West Bank, among the Muslim population, similar polls give a similar result. Approximately 75% of those surveyed consider the pogrom of October 7 a good thing…<br /> Thirdly, it was necessary to have a government capable of conducting international relations.<br /> Hamas is in charge in the Gaza Strip. Hamas does not behave like a government. It acts like the terrorist organization that it is.<br /> <br /> Like many terrorist groups before it, Hamas has cruelly kidnapped innocent victims in order to use them for blackmailing purposes internationally. Even though Hamas has support in Qatar, Turkey and Iran, this cannot be considered a capacity to conduct international relations. The fact that Hamas does not hesitate to collaborate with other terrorist organizations, such as Hezbollah, when it sees it fit, does not qualify it as a legitimate government either. Quite on the contrary.<br /> <br /> Hamas still refuses to release the remaining hostages and has once again rejected a ceasefire plan. It believes it can ensure its survival by continuing its diabolic "war."<br /> With its skillfully disseminated propaganda, Hamas intends to win world public opinion over to its side. It also has spokesmen in a number of media...and elsewhere, unfortunately.<br /> Hamas uses Gazan civilians as human shields, exploits their suffering, and makes sure that there is a maximum amount of collateral casualties when the Israeli army intervenes.<br /> Accusatory inversion, an old Bolshevik method of accusing the enemy of its own crimes, is used by Hamas to accuse Israel.<br /> Hamas hides in the tunnels, sets traps, and brutally oppresses the local population.<br /> This recalls Vietcong tactics.<br /> With its actions, its satanic propaganda, and its hostage blackmailing, Hamas seeks to instill fear, doubt, and disunity in Israel and in the rest of the world, in order to impose its own totalitarian Islamist ideology. This is a technique that has already been used by other terrorist groups, particularly those of the radical left (like the German RAF, for instance).<br /> Hamas must therefore be completely demilitarized and removed from all political power. Recognition of a Palestinian state is not an option otherwise. This is why Donald Trump rebuked Emmanuel Macron on the issue... <br /> Hamas is not just a small group of morons whose hateful sermons target Israel, the West, and all other "infidels." <br /> Hamas has already taken action and does not intend to stop there. Its goal is not to obtain a Palestinian state, but a "caliphate" well beyond such borders... The eradication of the State of Israel is a stated goal of Hamas in this context. The Palestinian state a stepping stone.<br /> Hamas is responsible for the terrorist attack of October 7, 2023 and called for worldwide jihad the day after the attack. Dominique Bernard was assassinated on October 13, 2023 in Arras...well before the start of the Israeli military response. <br /> <br /> Recognition of a Palestinian state, in the current state of affairs, would indeed be "a reward for terrorism" as Benjamin Netanyahu has said.<br /> It would also send a very dangerous signal to all Islamists on our planet because it would effectively mean that, little by little, goals can be achieved by the use of violence and terrorism.<br /> <br /> Why is Emmanuel Macron announcing this new version of a Palestinian state creation when all these facts are known?<br /> <br /> It also bears repeating this. No one wants to live next to a terrorist state that threatens to eradicate your own state.<br /> The French would certainly not be reassured if the perpetrators of the November 13, 2015 terrorist attacks were running a department in the Île-de-France region or a small neighboring state. This must be understood.<br /> <br /> As for the suffering. Of course, there is suffering in the Gaza Strip. This is unfortunate, but suffering is inherent to war, there is no war without it. For this to stop, Hamas must be put out of action, defeated.<br /> <br /> It is appropriate to spare a thought for the Israelis, who are living in distress as well, and who would also finally, one day, like to live in peace...<br /> <br /> And Emmanuel Macron should think before saying silly, sometimes dangerous things.<br /> He shouldn't have done away with the diplomatic corps. He should have surrounded himself with competent advisors in geopolitics.<br /> In the situation that we find ourselves in, he should above all work towards France's economic recovery, towards restoring France’s national cohesion, towards the protection of our borders, and towards stopping excessive migratory flows, well before considering sending troops to Greenland, or "guys to Odessa" or before suggesting that a Palestinian state be created when the conditions for this are simply not met...<br /> <br /> <br /> Marion Winter - August 17, 2025
Répondre