Les Chantiers de la Liberté

Idées et analyses sur les dynamiques politiques et diplomatiques.

Pierre Lellouche: "Recognize Palestine and punish Israel and all Jews"

Pierre Lellouche: "Recognize Palestine and punish Israel and all Jews"

OPINION - France's recognition of Palestine comes at a time when the isolation of Israel, its denunciation, and the stigmatization of Jews in general, whether they support Netanyahu's policies or not, are reaching unprecedented levels, notes the former minister*.

* Latest book published: Engrenages. La guerre d’Ukraine et le basculement du monde. (Éditions Odile Jacob, 2024).

We are living in the East and beyond at a turning point in history, where the very legitimacy of Israel is now openly contested, where the fate of Jews around the world is once again in question. The starting point is of course October 7.

At the risk of shocking, I personally believe that the political and military leader of Hamas at the time, Yahya Sinwar , in fact won a quadruple political victory by launching this massive attack against Israel: first, he managed to put the Palestinian question back at the heart of the problems of the Middle East ; as he had probably anticipated, the brutal Israeli response, given the small size of an urban territory of more than 2 million people serving as human shields for an army buried in a veritable underground city, could only lead to the almost unanimous denunciation of the Israeli bombings, to the point that Israel is today commonly referred to as a "genocidal" state ; Israel's relations with the Arab world are seriously damaged, as they are beginning to be with many Western countries, with the exception of the United States ; finally, anti-Semitism has become globalized after two years of war.

It is in this context that we must consider the initiative taken by President Macron, in conjunction with the Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia, to solemnly recognize the State of Palestine in a few days, on September 22.

Because, before getting to the substance of it, we must consider the timing of this initiative, which is essential in both political and diplomatic matters. President Macron announced that with this initiative, he had opened "an irreversible path to peace."

However, Mr. Macron cannot ignore the fact that his initiative comes at a time when, after two years of war in Gaza, the isolation of Israel, its denunciation, and the stigmatization of Jews in general, whether or not they support Netanyahu's policies, are reaching unprecedented levels.

As we approach the now fateful date of September 22, a date that coincides nicely with the Jewish New Year, a massive anti-Israeli mobilization, unprecedented I repeat, is spreading across the entire planet, also fueled, it is true, by the Israeli military escalation in Gaza, in the West Bank, not to mention the Israeli air raid against the Hamas leaders in Doha. We are experiencing a sort of tragic race against time: war on one side, anti-Israel mobilization on the other.

So here, by a disastrous reversal of history, is the State of Israel, born of the genocide of the Jews and the will of the international community, transformed in turn into a "Nazi" state, threatened from then on with finding itself delegitimized by the international community which had brought it into being in 1948.

How can we not see then that, in the current climate, further aggravated by the decision of the Israeli government to launch a ground offensive against the city of Gaza, the announced recognition can only add to the isolation of Israel, to its stigmatization, and even more seriously to that of all Jews?

If the objective was to make Israel a pariah state, a sort of second apartheid state, banished by the community of so-called "civilized" nations, then this objective is about to be achieved, at the risk of radicalizing Israel's policy even more... But if it was to advance peace, as Mr. Macron proclaimed, then one can legitimately doubt the result.

All the more so because beyond the timing, there is the substance.

In the initial version of April 2025, recognition was to follow and not precede the fulfillment of three cardinal conditions: the eradication of the bloodthirsty Hamas regime, its total demilitarization, coupled of course with the immediate release of the last hostages; secondly, the in-depth overhaul of the Palestinian Authority to make it capable of governing thenfuture Palestine ; thirdly, finally, this recognition was to be mutual, involving the Arab states, starting with Saudi Arabia. Thus conceived, this project had real coherence.

Shelved because of the Twelve Day War with Iran , the project was reworked in July.

The recognition of Palestine now no longer requires anything from Hamas, not even the release of the hostages. A Hamas whose charter, I recall, expressly states that this organization is Islamist and in no way nationalist, that it is fighting not for a Palestinian state, but for the total eradication of Israel.

Thus disfigured, the recognition desired by Macron is of course completely inaudible in Israel, forever marked by October 7.

Moreover, by no longer asking the Arab states for cross-recognition of Israel, the Macronian initiative only isolates Israel further, while threatening the sustainability of the Abraham Accords . These accords, I remind you, had opened a process of rapprochement with Israel, without any Palestinian prerequisite, which is precisely why Hamas, armed by Iran, attacked on October 7.

Of these conditions, all that remains today is a list of pious wishes contained in a resolution adopted by 142 states a few days ago in New York, under the pompous title of "New York Declaration on the Peaceful Settlement of the Question of Palestine and the Implementation of the Two-State Solution ."

This resolution, of course non- binding, stipulates that Hamas "must cease exercising its authority over the Gaza Strip " ... that it must hand over its weapons to the Palestinian Authority with the support and collaboration of the international community ... that it must finally release the hostages. But this after the recognition of September 22. Now everyone knows the value of such resolutions...

On September 22, Palestine will be unconditionally recognized by France. It is already recognized by more than 150 states, and Palestine has observer status at the UN. The question is: how does this additional symbolic recognition serve the cause of peace, or even the "two-state solution," which has been the European position since the Venice Declaration of 1978? Will it secure the departure of the Hamas leadership and its demilitarization?

Will it make the Palestinian Authority and Mahmoud Abbas more capable of leading a future State of Palestine?

Will it convince an isolated, politically besieged Israeli state, still threatened by the mullahs' regime and its Arab proxies, to finally consider defining its borders, which would, incidentally, require, I say, the end of proportional representation in Israel?

As for France, I fear that this recognition and its instrumentalization by certain political forces will only serve to tear even more the fragile cultural and religious fabric that our French nation has unfortunately become.

At least this spectacular diplomatic exercise will have allowed the French president to forget, for a few hours at least, his equally mediocre results in domestic politics.

 

By Pierre Lellouche

Paris, Friday, September 19th

Partager cet article

Repost0
Pour être informé des derniers articles, inscrivez vous :
Commenter cet article
M
UN Chapter VII — Action with respect to Threats to the Peace, Breaches of the Peace, and Acts of Aggression<br /> Article 51<br /> “Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defense if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations, until the Security Council has taken measures necessary to maintain international peace and security. Measures taken by Members in the exercise of this right of self-defense shall be immediately reported to the Security Council and shall not in any way affect the authority and responsibility of the Security Council under the present Charter to take at any time such action as it deems necessary in order to maintain or restore international peace and security.”<br /> Article 51 clearly states that Israel has the inherent right of individual or collective self-defense. Israel’s action against Hamas is legitimate.<br /> And, the UN should be taking appropriate action to restore international peace and security…<br /> Does recognizing a “Palestinian state” where Hamas is in charge of a population – largely subjugated by radical Islam - of an ill-defined territory, mean that international peace and security can effectively be restored ?<br /> Hamas is a terrorist organization.<br /> Hamas is aiming at worldwide jihad.<br /> Hamas wants to destabilize the whole Western world.<br /> Hamas wants the total destruction of Israel.<br /> Hamas knew that its largescale terrorist attack of October 7 would not and could not go without a response. <br /> Hamas is skillfully disseminating its evil propaganda permanently wrongly accusing Israel and victimizing itself.<br /> Hamas is using accusatory inversion to implement its own pseudo-theocratic, totalitarian ideology and is counting on an ideological blindness in the West.<br /> Hamas is acting as if it was the vanguard of a big, world-wide Islamist revolution, and violence is every terrorist’s means of getting there. The Palestinian flag is the flagship itself meant to conquer all spirits. Before, the red flag with its hammer and sickle had that same function. It was the instrument destined to rally everybody around the common cause. The portrait of Che Guevara was (and maybe still is) another such instrument. The modus operandi is very similar…<br /> <br /> Hamas and the forces behind it, have now - with the support of certain media and politicians - succeeded in driving a wedge into the community of the Western nations. <br /> <br /> Divide and rule…<br /> <br /> Are we restoring international peace and security if Hamas is NOT entirely demilitarized and NOT removed from all political power ?<br /> <br /> Recognizing a “Palestinian state” in the current state of affairs would be a diplomatic capitulation and a big strategic mistake as it would indeed be "a reward for terrorism" as Benjamin Netanyahu has said, as we would give in to terrorist pressure. We would be sending a very dangerous signal to all Islamists in this world because it would effectively mean that, little by little, goals can be achieved by the use of violence and terrorism.<br /> We would not be moving towards international peace and security. We would be reinforcing Hamas and give a new impetus to violence and terrorism.<br /> <br /> Vile spirits in France and in other countries are already exploiting this situation.<br /> <br /> Creating a new state alone, does not inevitably lead to eternal peace and security either.<br /> Only recently, thanks to the diplomatic efforts of the Trump administration a - potentially nuclear -war between India and Pakistan has been prevented. The Indian subcontinent has been divided into a largely Hindu and two largely Muslim states…but, the conflictuality has not vanished into thin air unfortunately…<br /> <br /> If a “Palestinian state” was actually created, would all nations on this planet simultaneously recognize the State of Israel (i.e. Iran) ? This reciprocity is nonetheless a condition sine qua non…<br /> <br /> The choice of now scheduling the Palestinian state recognition for September 22 adds to the ignobility of the very idea…<br /> <br /> Last, but not least, all those who would want to create a “Palestinian state” in the current state of affairs, HAVE FORGOTTEN ABOUT THE HOSTAGES…<br /> Hamas does NOT want to release the remaining hostages.<br /> <br /> <br /> To conclude, the conditions for Palestinian statehood today are simply NOT met. <br /> <br /> <br /> Marion Winter – September 20, 2025<br /> <br /> P.S.: Some people would even claim that a Palestinian state already exists…a state called Jordan…
Répondre